Canon 5D II with Canon 24-105L f/4 @ 105mm - enough bokeh for you? Like I said, it's an extremely versatile lens. Anyone going on holiday with a FF camera without this in their bag is missing a trick. Sure, MTF charts and shooting photos of brick walls will try and convince you that you need the 24-70L f/2.8 II because the IQ of the 24-105 is
Dust and moisture resistant and incorporating Canon's very finest standards of precision optics, the EF 24-105mm f4L IS USM is designed for reportage, event, travel, and celebrity photographers looking for a lightweight and maneuverable lens with minimal image quality compromise.
We’ve seen launches of such devices as the Canon EF 24-70 mm f/4L IS USM and the cheaper Canon EF 24-105 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM. Despite that fact Canon considered 11 years a stretch of time long enough to withdraw their lens from the market and in August 2016 they presented its successor, the Canon EF 24-105 mm f/4L IS II USM.
Key Features. Reduce the amount of stray light that enters the front element of your EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM and EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM Lens with the Canon lens Hood EW-83M. By shading the front of the optic and blocking excess light, it prevents flare. Additionally, because it protrudes past the end of the lens, the hood offers some
EOSSpeedLite wrote: I have the Canon 24-105L F4 Mark I, and the Canon 24-70L F2.8 Mark II. The 24-105L is obviously inferior to the 24-70 in color rendition, sharpness, and general photo quality. I love the bokeh of the 24-70 but you don't get much with the 24-105.
April 2018 Nikon Canon Tokina LEICA Fuji Sony Zeiss All Reviews. Best 24-70mm Lenses Compared. Canon 24-105/4 L IS II. Canon 24-105 f/4 IS. Canon 24-105mm STM.
It is fair to add that the AF in 24-105/4L II is not any slower. Regarding DOF the 24-105 provides more background blur at 105/4 then the 24-70 at 70/2.8. So deciding between these two is really not about which is better (both are equally very good) but how the lens will be used. Canon_Guy's gear list:
If you're in the market for a zoom lens for a full-frame camera, and don't require the f/2.8 light-gathering capability that pro lenses like the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM and Nikon AF-SHi everyone. I just picked up the RP (still on way from Canon) to replace my 80D since I wanted an "in" into the FF world. Anyways, I am on a budget, but I can get the 24-105 EF L lens (first version since I don't do any videography) for around 400€. I could also get the RF version for 1,100€. That's considerably more.
If you want to invest in a lens to carry over to a future full frame R camera, then the 24-105 is your best bet. I've done the same with my 77D to get a bit more reach. EF lenses have the reputation to work well adapted to R bodies. RF lenses seem to be a bit better and lighter than their adapter RF ciblings, though.
canon ef 24 105 ii review
